If Hunt’s Science is Reality, I Choose the Girls Only Lab..

We are just not going to catch a break this month, my darlings.  Speaking at the World Conference of Science Journalists, in a session honoring women in science, Nobel Laureate Tim Hunt gave a talk that was more than a tad controversial. From the Buzzfeed story

Tim Hunt, who won the 2001 Nobel Prize in medicine for his work on cell duplication, was speaking at an invitation-only lunch in honor of women in science. He reportedly opened his talk by saying: “Thanks to the women journalists for making lunch.”

The 72-year-old scientist went on to say that he has a reputation as a chauvinist, and that labs should be segregated by sex. The problem with female scientists? “You fall in love with them, they fall in love with you, and when you criticize them, they cry!”

Uncool in the worst possible way, but all of this has me thinking about two things…

1) The Royal Society, of which Hunt is a fellow, quickly released a statement “distancing themselves” from Hunt’s statements, saying

Too many talented individuals do not fulfil (sic) their scientific potential because of issues such as gender and the Society is committed to helping to put this right. Sir Tim Hunt was speaking as an individual and his reported comments in no way reflect the views of the Royal Society.

Thus, I say unto them, that statement, verily, is a heap of bullshit. This is a profession of values without commitment. I mean, I think about these sorts of non-pologies a lot. The Royal Society, like the National Academy, has a diversity problem. It’s composed of 6% women and 16% minorities and it’s made only the most minor strides in the last decade, although it celebrates the increase in the election of women to 10% on its webpage.

But, I think to myself, is this the kind of organization I would want to be affiliated with? Would I be proud to be elected as a member? Yes, it’s prestigious among all the pale and male, but would I be proud to be a member of a club that claims to value inclusion and diversity while also allowing people like Tim Hunt to hold the honor of membership? What does that mean for my membership if that’s the caliber of people in my club? It’s not enough for me anymore for an organization to say that it “values diversity” and that it “vows to increase the representation of underrepresented parties”. You’ve gotta both open the door and kick out the horrible people that make underrepresented people uncomfortable. *AND*, to put the task of increasing membership in the hands of people that have such disdain for underrepresented groups via the peer review system only proves how little commitment The Royal Society actually has to increasing diversity among its membership.  If the party is being held by people like Tim Hunt, I don’t think I want an invitation.  I’ll stay at the Girls Only party.

Let me be more blunt. The Royal Society cannot speak credibly about valuing diversity if it allows Tim Hunt to remain a fellow with the ability to vote on new members when he has spoken so clearly about his “reputation for being a chauvinist.”

2) I feel the ire of my colleagues at the suggestion that they be segregated from male scientists because they simply can’t help but fall in love and have their delicate hearts broken.  I support said ire. What I do not support is the implication that this is more offensive because Hunt is, to put it in Tiny Diva-speak, “ew-y”. True, Tim Hunt has flowing, glossy, Rapunzel-esque nose hair. Of course, we ladies wouldn’t really be interested in him! Still, one woman’s nasty sneezer whiskers, is another woman’s reigns with which to ride the stallion…as it were. Surely he’s making someone’s panties moist.

Addendum: Moist is a nasty word.

Pointing out someone’s appearance creates an unfortunate bit of logic. It’s obvious that we ladies don’t need to be segregated because he is gross and there’s no way we would fall head over heels for a hairy shnoz-ed hobbit.  By extension, if he were attractive, it might be a different story. Elect Idris Elba to The Royal Society and we lady scientists might need to be cloistered.  What he said is wrong, regardless of how he looks. Shaming him for his appearance, though, suggests the sort of fault-by-appearance and body shaming that women fight against so frequently when it comes to accusations that it’s “our fault” because of how we look or how we were dressed. Or conversely, we’re too fat, or two ugly, or…

 

 

Ask Isis – “Help! My adviser won’t stop looking down my shirt!”

I was not originally asked for my opinion in response to this question in Science Careers’ advice column, which is a shame because my advice would have made Alice’s look hella dumb (Archived here –Help! My adviser won’t stop looking down my shirt! _ Science Careers).  A postdoc writes to Alice with the following problem:

I’ve just joined a new lab for my second postdoc. It’s a good lab. I’m happy with my project. I think it could really lead to some good results. My adviser is a good scientist, and he seems like a nice guy. Here’s the problem: Whenever we meet in his office, I catch him trying to look down my shirt. Not that this matters, but he’s married.

What should I do?

If you missed the response…Lord, help us all. It was a gem. Although it has since been taken down and a brief mea culpa issued by Science. Here it is…

Imagine what life would be like if there were no individuals of the opposite—or preferred—sex. It would be pretty dull, eh? Well, like it or not, the workplace is a part of life.

It’s true that, in principle, we’re all supposed to be asexual while working. But the kind of behavior you mention is common in the workplace. Once, a friend told me that he was so distracted by an attractive visiting professor that he could not concentrate on a word of her seminar. Your adviser may not even be aware of what he is doing.

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) defines unlawful sexual harassment as “unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical harassment of a sexual nature.” It goes on to say that “harassment is illegal when it is so frequent or severe that it creates a hostile or offensive work environment or when it results in an adverse employment decision (such as the victim being fired or demoted).” I’m not an attorney, but to me the behavior you’re describing doesn’t seem unlawful by this standard.

Some definitions of sexual harassment do include inappropriate looking or staring, especially when it’s repeated to the point where the workplace becomes inhospitable. Has it reached that point? I don’t mean to suggest that leering is appropriate workplace behavior—it isn’t—but it is human and up to a point, I think, forgivable. Certainly there are worse things, including the unlawful behaviors described by the EEOC. No one should ever use a position of authority to take sexual advantage of another.

As long as your adviser does not move on to other advances, I suggest you put up with it, with good humor if you can. Just make sure that he is listening to you and your ideas, taking in the results you are presenting, and taking your science seriously. His attention on your chest may be unwelcome, but you need his attention on your science and his best advice.

—Alice

I will begin by reiterating something that caused a bit of a cool drizzle on Twitter a little bit ago. I do not agree with Alice’s response, but I am not surprised by it coming from a woman at her stage in her career. Women working in faculty positions is a historically recent phenomenon and the boys in the club have not been known for their best behavior. These women entered their fields when things were even worse than they are now. I have commonly encountered a “keep your head down”  and “put up with it” attitude from women of this generation (Alice is 76) and it seems to be motivated by one of two attitudes…

1) This is how it is around here and this is the shit we have to deal with in order to succeed and be accepted by these dudes. I dealt with it and you will too. Get back to work.

2) There aren’t many of us around here. If you run your mouth, you’re going to lose your job. Be grateful you’re here and get back to work.

Either way, I have heard many women of this era advocate “putting up with it” because at least it isn’t worse…(until it is).

I reject Alice’s assertion that we’re all sexual beings and this is just how men are and the quoting of harassment law is pretty shitty and victim blaming.  This is not something that all men do to all women non-discriminately, at all stages of their careers. No one’s oogling my boobs any more, and it’s not simply because I’m starting to develop what Jen Kirkman refers to as “cougar boobs.” They’re a little saggier and a little sun spotted, but they are generally still good boobs worthy of oogling. Men don’t leer at my titties like they used to because the consequences to them for doing it are greater and the consequences to me for reporting it are lower. Older men with permanent jobs harass younger women in temporary training positions because the risk of serious consequences is low. It’s not nature, it’s sleezy. These men do not respect these women as their colleagues. It most certainly *is* harassment and it likely reflects a pattern of behavior. The victim blaming in Alice’s column is disgraceful, especially given that the letter writer is a trainee. The trainee pool should never be a fuck buffet, even if the occasional person finds love in the arms of their postdoc advisor..

It’s not crazy to ask coworkers to behave like this isn’t a larger version of The Match Game.

So what does the letter writer do about it? That’s the catch-22. The relative positions of power of those involved make this a difficult situation for the leer-ee relative to the leer-er.  Dealing with harassment in the workplace is always an exercise in cost reward and no one can weigh those except the person in the situation. I have certainly put up with more than I was proud of in the interest of feeding my family.

So, what are the options? The letter writer could take Alice’s advice and “deal with it because at least it’s not ‘real’ harassment.” The risk is that he continues to harass her, he escalates his harassment, or he harasses someone else.

In my university’s sexual harassment training, reporting a harasser was always the “right” answer and allegedly the university always works to protect the accuser. So, what are the risks of confronting or reporting? That these protections don’t come and the person loses her job or position.

What I don’t recommend is operating under the assumption that there is anything that a woman can do to “change” her harasser’s behavior. These behaviors come from a place of entitlement and privilege and I don’t believe that these are ever single occurrences. Alice suggests that this person focus on whether her advisor is helping her career, but these men never see their female trainees equal to their male trainees.

In the meantime, document everything that makes you uncomfortable. I send emails to myself noting key events in my professional life so that they are independently time stamped (UPDATE: from your work email to an external one that you control) and I send letters to myself to let the post office postmark things for me. This saved me during my recent human resources debacle.

The last part is most important. Alice’s advice is that she needs this person for his professional guidance and future recommendations. Start working to make that less true. Find other mentors at your university who you can establish a track record so that if one relationship goes to shit, you have a history with other people who might advocate for you. Your future should never be in one person’s hands.

Happy Mother’s Day…? Yes. Happy Mother’s Day.

It’s been a while since a I wrote a blog post. Part of that is that I have always shared the personal details of my life here as sort of a personal journal and I have had stuff I really haven’t wanted to share. I decided to separate from  Mr. Isis in August because…well..reasons. Mostly reasons I don’t really want to talk about. I still have very warm and love-y feelings for Mr. Isis and I am hoping that we can keep working on our relationship as good friends and co-parents.  He gave me a lovely card and flowers for Mother’s Day and I was grateful…

I moved to new MRU town last August and being a single mother has been no joke…then in February I had shingles and ended up in the hospital when I started to get forgetful with certain words. Allegedly shingles can travel backwards and infect the brain, causing encephalitis.  This is exactly why I hate the brain. I’m still having trouble with days of the week and rely much more heavily on my calendar than I ever did. I used to use it mostly as a formality to let people know where I would be and I could remember 99.9% of my appointments, but now I need it to know where to be from hour to hour and to know what day is coming next.

In the middle of April, I terminated someone’s employment. I can’t really say more, but there is not much more in the world that sucks harder than that.

My lab has been under construction and I am lucky that MRU agreed to build me a new, beautiful lab when they recruited me . As one might expect, it had been delayed several months and I got some temporary space in the meantime. My lab was set to open on May 1st.  On April 25th we had a bad storm and the ceiling above my temporary space collapsed, covering contents of my start-up with an abundance of dirty storm water, roof paraphernalia and ceiling tile.  Now I am learning about risk management and university insurance and what-not.

But, I’m really blessed. I have a lot of love in my life and two amazing children. Naughty children, but amazing children who make every day both a challenge and a blessing.

If there’s one thing the last eight months have made clear to me, it’s that if we really care about the sustainable careers of women in science, we’d spend a little less money on lip service vis-a-vis these gender equity seminars and focus on advocating for sustained, predictable growth of the NIH budget (and NSF for you wackadoodles who do that sort of thing)).

I could spend a little more time at home if I wasn’t submitting 10 grants a year.

(fin)

Wives and Lovers and Scientists and Drag Queens

(Scene 1)

Yesterday I followed the #inmyshoes hashtag a little bit and, although I get the desire to support a little, 8 year old muppet that just wants dinosaurs on her shoes, I also find myself salty and exhausted by the crusade.  For reference, I posted this to the feed of especially ugly, but ( I’m sure) functional, footwear:

I mean, I feel the science ladies…ish. I think it’s great when a child loves dinosaur shoes and fossils because they are such pure little vessels of innocence that society hasn’t fucked up yet..which may be why I feel uncomfortable co-opting her story for our lady scientist crusades. As if to imply that lady lawyers and doctors and architects, etc can’t like dinosaur shoes.  Or that the princess-wearing girls don’t also deserve our support. There’s a particular flavor of inclusion that feels like exclusion. Patriarchy is a real motherfucker sometimes. A universal motherfucker.

(Scene 2)

I’ve been watching a lot of videos of drag super diva Adore Delano with Tiny Diva. Tiny Diva is in love with Danny Noriega’s alter ego, especially her Hello, I Love You video.  As a fellow city angel, I am completely and entirely obsessed with Adore Delano, although my love for Noriega’s drag personas began with Angel Baby who reminds me of every girl I grew up with and of myself all too frequently..

Watching Adore Delano has also provided for some interesting conversation with Little Isis, who is now realizing that being a man or being a woman isn’t as simple as what’s in your jeans or what society tells you to look like. There is a historical context to almost everything we do as men and women.

I wonder how Adore Delano suffers through a world with shoes built for XX feet.

(Scene 3)

This morning I dropped Little Isis off at school with a pinch, an “I Love You,” and the promise of an early pick up tomorrow to get milkshakes before I leave for Experimental Biology.

I was focused on getting home to bleach my mustache and darken my roots because my situation was not cute.

On the way to drop Tiny Diva at school, we heard Jack Jones’s 60s hit Wives and Lovers.  Yester-year’s dated lyrics, played for a new generation of ears..

Performance art gives way to performance art, gives way to performance art, gives way to performance art. Yesterday’s wives and lovers give rise to today’s lady scientist.

On Getting Cockblocked By Colleagues and Science

Today, my darling muppets, I can only laugh at the happenings. I can only laugh…

I have this hilarious colleague who is also one of the most famous surgeons of a particular body part type in our region.  Watching him prepare to operate is hilarious. He stands at the patient, rocks, and says “Ok. Can we go? Can I start? Are we ready?” obsessively until you finally give him the ok. Once he starts, he’s happy as a clam.

impatient

These last couple of weeks, I’ve been feeling like him. Restarting a lab is no joke.  All of the approvals and hiring and other such buullshittery. My lab still isn’t ready, so I’ve finally secured temporary space. We’ve made lists of the things we needed and ordered, but it took several iterations until we really had everything. We were finally there. We had finally made it down the home stretch. I ordered our experimental reagents and had them settling in to adapt to the new environment after shipping. Tuesday was to be the day the day the magic started. Then this morning I get an email from another lab which reads (summarized, of course):

Dear Dr. Isis,

One of the members of our lab took four of your reagents and did something irreversible to them so that you can’t use them. We can give you four of our reagents [which are not the same and would therefore be completely useless to you] or order you more or whatever you want, which you’ll then have to keep baking for a while at your expense until you can use them. Oops. Our bad.

Signed,
Another dude.

GAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!