I’d like some advice on this one. I’m not sure I’m doing the right thing. I’ve got a former student who is a strong and good researcher. This person (I’m trying to keep gender out of it) has a great CV, lots of good pubs, including 1 glamour-ish one. They’re doing a postdoc in a really great lab, learned new skills, mentored undergrads, works harder than three other people combined, etc. They’re getting many interviews for good jobs. What’s the problem? This person is a royal pain in the ass. High maintenance.Prima Donna. Gets asked back for a second interview and makes unrealistic demands for seed money, for space, for time-specifics. Once, about the time they left my lab, we had a talk about this. It degenerated quickly, and was pointless. Since then, I’ve just backed off. It’s easy to send a relatively neutral letter – here are the good things, period. Call if you want more information. I’ve had a few calls, in which I have been more forthcoming. I’m not inclined to get more involved, and re-open communication. Its been three years of looking for a job, I’ve sent about 30-40 letters, lots of interviews and nothing. But, as a mentor, should I write a letter to the trainee and say “look the reason you don’t have a job is that you are basically an asshole and everyone in the field knows it” (except with nicer words)? Or let sleeping dogs sleep?
The Gospel According to Isis
Monisha on Because It Sets A Bad Preceden… Anonymous on Because It Sets A Bad Preceden… drugmonkey on Because It Sets A Bad Preceden… Anonymous on Because It Sets A Bad Preceden… GMP on Because It Sets A Bad Preceden…
Follow me on TwitterMy Tweets